Showing posts with label architecture. Show all posts
Showing posts with label architecture. Show all posts
Saturday, April 11, 2009
Andrew Ballantyne: Architecture: a very short review
Ballantyne's Architecture: A very Short Introduction deals more with the meaning of architecture. The "why" of a given structure, design and so forth. The most compelling question, that he asks on page 3 is 'Do I want to be the sort of person who lives in a place like this'? He introduces this question a few paragraphs earlier withe the example that the ratio of motorways to parkland shows how much our society values each relative to the other. How do we dwell in the world and how do we chose that mode of dwelling?
Wednesday, December 24, 2008
an exploration of the video game as architecture using phenomenological methodology
Phenomenology is an attempt to make rigorous accounts of subjective experience. One way of briefly illustrating the problem is by considering the following quote attributed to musician Fats Waller regarding what Jazz is;
"…if you hafta ask, you ain't never gonna know!"
Phenomenology attempts to offer a rigorous approach to getting answers to such questions without resorting to mysticism or metaphysics on one hand or reducing experience to the denigrated status of qualia. Qualia is term used to refer to experience as a minor phenomena produced by the physical universe.
When we play a video game, if it is successfully executed, we become immersed in a two dimensional representation of a two or three dimensional space. We may become a medieval Persian prince as in the game Prince of Persia, even though we are female. We may become immersed as an acrobatic Asian female leaping across the roof tops of a futuristic Tokyo, as in the game Mirror's Edge although we are clumsy, Caucasian males.
Our identity then becomes briefly mirrored on either side of the screen. Within that screen we have both landscapes and and architecture, whether it is the expansive worlds of games such as Myst or the multiplayer online worlds of games such as Second Life or World of Warcraft.
And at what point does the game itself become an architecture? We experience moving through an environment that we interpret as "Bricks and Mortar" even as we sit on a couch or perhaps perform the "Wii dance" as they simulate riding a snowboard, fighting monsters or bowling. Is this an essentially architectural experience albeit a virtual one?
The Polish Philosopher, Roman Ingarden offers a perspective in his book "The Ontology of the Work of Art". As a phenomenologist, he is interested in how we consciously experience phenomena, in this case specifically architecture. As an psychologically interior experience how does "brick & mortar" differ from pixels on a screen? Both are intended structures; That is to say a creative vision went into their creation. The individual encountering them treats them as objects with mass, oapacity and presence.
"…if you hafta ask, you ain't never gonna know!"
Phenomenology attempts to offer a rigorous approach to getting answers to such questions without resorting to mysticism or metaphysics on one hand or reducing experience to the denigrated status of qualia. Qualia is term used to refer to experience as a minor phenomena produced by the physical universe.
When we play a video game, if it is successfully executed, we become immersed in a two dimensional representation of a two or three dimensional space. We may become a medieval Persian prince as in the game Prince of Persia, even though we are female. We may become immersed as an acrobatic Asian female leaping across the roof tops of a futuristic Tokyo, as in the game Mirror's Edge although we are clumsy, Caucasian males.
Our identity then becomes briefly mirrored on either side of the screen. Within that screen we have both landscapes and and architecture, whether it is the expansive worlds of games such as Myst or the multiplayer online worlds of games such as Second Life or World of Warcraft.
And at what point does the game itself become an architecture? We experience moving through an environment that we interpret as "Bricks and Mortar" even as we sit on a couch or perhaps perform the "Wii dance" as they simulate riding a snowboard, fighting monsters or bowling. Is this an essentially architectural experience albeit a virtual one?
The Polish Philosopher, Roman Ingarden offers a perspective in his book "The Ontology of the Work of Art". As a phenomenologist, he is interested in how we consciously experience phenomena, in this case specifically architecture. As an psychologically interior experience how does "brick & mortar" differ from pixels on a screen? Both are intended structures; That is to say a creative vision went into their creation. The individual encountering them treats them as objects with mass, oapacity and presence.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
